H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-1

Tomas Berdych holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2009 Stuttgart third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 16, 2009* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Kiefer #40 6-3 6-3 Tomas Berdych #21 Match data
Jun 14, 2007* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Tomas Berdych #13 6-4 7-6(3) Nicolas Kiefer #404 Match data
Jun 4, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Tomas Berdych #20 6-1 (ret.) Nicolas Kiefer #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 — — — — — — —