H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 6-0

Tomas Berdych holds a 6–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2015 Wimbledon second round 6-1 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 2, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tomas Berdych #6 6-1 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #66 Match data
Feb 14, 2014* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-4 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #44 Match data
Mar 24, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 7-5 6-1 Nicolas Mahut #92 Match data
Feb 4, 2012* Montpellier ATP 250 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #78 Match data
Sep 27, 2008* Bangkok ATP 250 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #27 7-6(6) 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #74 Match data
Jan 21, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tomas Berdych #116 6-4 6-2 5-7 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #95 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4