H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 3-0
Tomas Berdych holds a 3–0 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2010 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2010* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-4 6-4 | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
| Nov 5, 2009* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-4 | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tomas Berdych | 6-2 6-4 6-4 | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | #914 | #12 | 2,000 | 1,961 | 268 | 297 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Paul-Henri Mathieu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #36 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #123 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #33 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #97 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #58 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #129 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #96 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2015 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #95 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #249 | 1,574 | 0 | 4 |