H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 3-1

Tomas Berdych holds a 3–1 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2015 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Tomas Berdych #4 6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 Radek Stepanek #129 Match data
Oct 12, 2011* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-4 6-3 Radek Stepanek #26 Match data
Feb 16, 2006* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #22 7-5 6-4 Tomas Berdych #24 Match data
Nov 6, 2005* Paris Masters Masters 1000 SF Carpet Tomas Berdych #50 6-1 3-6 6-3 Radek Stepanek #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5