H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Rainer Schuettler H2H: 2-0
Tomas Berdych holds a 2–0 lead over Rainer Schuettler in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2008 Madrid Masters second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2008* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 6-2 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2005* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tomas Berdych | Rainer Schuettler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |