H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 2-0

Tomas Berdych holds a 2–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2016 Miami Open second round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Berdych #7 (w/o) Rajeev Ram #61 Match data Mar 26, 2016* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tomas Berdych #6 6-1 6-3 Rajeev Ram #103 Match data Feb 27, 2013* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,233 599 324 64.9% 0 1 0 3 9 13
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 15–14 51.7% #45 1,699 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,871 0 2 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,909 0 3 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 2008 32–19 62.7% #20 1,924 0 4 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,888 0 5 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,922 0 5 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,082 0 6 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 2012 52–21 71.2% #6 2,153 0 8 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,081 0 8 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,083 0 10 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,111 0 12 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,029 0 13 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,921 0 13 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,873 0 13 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Berdych Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 12 14 26 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2007 21 14 35 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 25 14 39 64.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 21 16 37 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 25 19 44 56.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 36 15 51 70.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
26 2012 39 14 53 73.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2013 36 16 52 69.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 38 15 53 71.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2015 40 16 56 71.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2016 27 13 40 67.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2017 17 10 27 63.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — —
32 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 2019 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 391 211 602 65.0% 131 79 210 62.4% 68 31 99 68.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 909/923 of Tomas Berdych's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Berdych Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 3/3 13.3 4.7 56.4% 72.9% 52.7% 68.7% 29.2% 64.3% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 25/29 7.5 3.8 58.1% 72.3% 47.6% 55.4% 42.0% 62.1% 37.8% 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 2005 57/57 7.6 2.8 57.3% 74.0% 51.4% 56.0% 44.2% 64.3% 36.2% 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 2006 66/66 7.6 2.8 58.6% 76.0% 52.3% 57.2% 43.6% 65.9% 38.9% 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 2007 62/63 7.7 2.3 58.9% 78.4% 55.0% 65.5% 48.9% 68.9% 37.7% 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 2008 48/51 8.0 2.1 60.3% 76.4% 55.0% 62.4% 46.9% 67.9% 38.5% 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 2009 57/57 6.8 2.5 58.9% 74.3% 52.7% 60.4% 39.3% 65.5% 37.5% 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2010 65/65 8.1 2.4 56.4% 79.6% 56.8% 64.4% 43.0% 69.6% 40.2% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2011 73/74 6.6 2.0 58.1% 77.7% 54.4% 53.0% 43.8% 67.8% 40.5% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 2012 72/73 8.5 2.3 58.8% 78.5% 55.1% 67.5% 45.3% 68.8% 39.5% 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2013 74/75 8.1 2.3 58.6% 78.0% 52.4% 64.1% 43.5% 67.5% 40.0% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2014 74/75 8.2 2.6 57.5% 78.8% 54.9% 65.2% 41.6% 68.6% 39.1% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2015 79/79 7.4 2.0 56.6% 78.0% 55.5% 60.4% 48.5% 68.3% 39.9% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2016 57/58 8.4 3.0 57.1% 78.0% 50.4% 58.8% 40.7% 66.2% 36.6% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 2017 53/53 7.8 2.4 57.8% 78.9% 55.1% 66.9% 51.8% 68.8% 36.1% 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 2018 22/23 8.2 1.9 60.3% 76.5% 50.0% 66.5% 38.8% 66.2% 37.0% 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 2019 22/22 6.7 2.5 59.0% 75.2% 51.5% 64.8% 39.7% 65.4% 36.8% 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
Career — 909/923 7.8 2.5 58.1% 77.3% 53.6% 61.7% 44.3% 67.4% 38.6% — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Berdych Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1526 108.9 +0.33 -1.90 0.983 49.1% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.09 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1699 136.0 +0.40 +0.09 0.997 50.0% -15 -38 — 48.1% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.26 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
19 2005 1871 147.6 +2.21 -0.32 1.012 50.3% -3 -159 -286 54.1% +0.29 12–11 (52%) 13–14 (48%) — -2.61 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02
20 2006 1934 149.9 +3.95 +1.79 1.142 52.2% -25 -144 -133 59.6% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.19 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23
21 2007 1909 153.2 +5.09 +1.51 1.210 53.2% -28 -81 +50 65.3% +1.03 6–5 (55%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.36 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22
22 2008 1924 157.2 +4.14 +2.63 1.197 53.0% +18 -89 +16 61.1% +0.86 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.54 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
23 2009 1889 149.6 +1.93 +1.34 1.088 51.1% +8 -68 +89 56.1% +0.35 13–11 (54%) 14–8 (64%) — +1.55 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
24 2010 1922 165.7 +5.92 +4.41 1.325 54.2% -60 +13 +227 62.2% +1.05 10–12 (45%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.74 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
25 2011 2083 169.8 +5.45 +3.99 1.258 54.0% +29 -160 +53 69.2% +1.41 11–7 (61%) 13–7 (65%) — +2.97 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97
26 2012 2154 175.6 +5.87 +4.18 1.263 54.1% +29 -74 -142 66.3% +1.18 12–7 (63%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.55 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56
27 2013 2082 173.8 +4.74 +4.38 1.231 53.4% +45 -31 -22 67.2% +1.15 9–11 (45%) 17–17 (50%) — +0.42 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2014 2084 170.2 +4.10 +3.96 1.243 53.3% +44 -21 -19 68.2% +1.12 9–9 (50%) 9–16 (36%) — +3.87 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50
29 2015 2112 176.1 +5.06 +4.69 1.258 53.9% +44 +48 -47 67.7% +1.11 9–5 (64%) 24–10 (71%) — +2.13 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29
30 2016 2081 169.7 +3.41 +1.04 1.085 51.4% +7 +79 +38 60.9% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.93 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65
31 2017 2029 162.0 +4.46 +0.86 1.159 52.5% -34 +39 +113 61.1% +0.67 7–8 (47%) 16–13 (55%) — -1.68 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64
32 2018 1922 155.3 +2.29 +0.98 1.096 51.6% +93 +39 +185 53.4% +0.60 1–6 (14%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66
33 2019 1873 152.7 +1.30 +0.72 1.063 51.0% +63 — — 55.0% +0.40 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.94 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2233 169.6 +4.17 +2.64 1.181 52.7% +14 -50 +11 62.3% +0.85 135–115 (54%) 200–177 (53%) 97.9 +0.51 — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.