H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Robin Haase H2H: 3-2

Tomas Berdych holds a 3–2 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2019 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 2019* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #57 6-1 6-3 6-3 Robin Haase #58 Match data
May 10, 2017* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tomas Berdych #14 7-6(5) 6-3 Robin Haase #45 Match data
Mar 2, 2017* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Robin Haase #66 3-6 6-3 6-4 Tomas Berdych #14 Match data
Jan 20, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tomas Berdych #21 6-0 6-3 6-3 Robin Haase #390 Match data
Aug 7, 2007* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Robin Haase #103 6-4 7-5 Tomas Berdych #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 255 44.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Robin Haase
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,778 0 1
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2012 16–25 39.0% #56 1,700 0 2
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,767 0 2
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2016 14–19 42.4% #59 1,756 0 2
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,811 0 2
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,685 0 2
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,661 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,615 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,531 0 2