H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Sam Querrey H2H: 5-1

Tomas Berdych holds a 5–1 lead over Sam Querrey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 5–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2013 Miami Masters fourth round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 27, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 6-1 6-1 Sam Querrey #20 Match data
Oct 12, 2012* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 Sam Querrey #22 Match data
Sep 2, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 6-2 Sam Querrey #28 Match data
Aug 24, 2012* Winston-Salem ATP 250 SF Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-4 6-3 Sam Querrey #28 Match data
Aug 27, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sam Querrey #55 6-3 6-1 6-2 Tomas Berdych #22 Match data
Mar 30, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #10 6-1 6-2 Sam Querrey #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,037 372 315 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Sam Querrey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,540 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,636 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2008 28–23 54.9% #39 1,786 0 1
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,899 0 2
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,816 0 6
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,877 0 7
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,893 0 7
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,810 0 7
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,798 0 8
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,943 0 10
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,822 0 10
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,817 0 10
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,702 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,649 0 10