H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Simone Bolelli H2H: 3-3

Tomas Berdych and Simone Bolelli are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2015 St. Petersburg fourth round 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Simone Bolelli
ITA Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 2015* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Hard Simone Bolelli #63 7-6(5) 6-4 Tomas Berdych #5 Match data
Feb 26, 2015* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #8 7-6(7) 5-7 6-0 Simone Bolelli #52 Match data
May 27, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Simone Bolelli #58 6-4 6-4 5-7 4-6 6-3 Tomas Berdych #20 Match data
Oct 23, 2008* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard Simone Bolelli #42 6-4 7-5 Tomas Berdych #22 Match data
Sep 26, 2008* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #27 7-5 6-1 Simone Bolelli #45 Match data
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #9 7-5 6-3 6-3 Simone Bolelli #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Simone Bolelli #1,391 #36 1,686 1,920 114 156 42.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Simone Bolelli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2006 0–4 0.0% #127 1,465 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2007 8–14 36.4% #67 1,602 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2008 26–27 49.1% #41 1,785 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2009 14–22 38.9% #93 1,694 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2010 5–11 31.2% #107 1,675 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2011 4–8 33.3% #134 1,679 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2012 6–10 37.5% #84 1,713 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2013 6–8 42.9% #245 1,693 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2014 6–8 42.9% #55 1,743 0 0
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2015 28–25 52.8% #58 1,865 0 0
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2016 2–8 20.0% #464 1,770 0 0
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2017 2–4 33.3% #171 1,792 0 0
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2018 5–4 55.6% #141 1,783 0 0
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2019 1–3 25.0% #334 1,734 0 0
39 — — — — — — — 2025 1–0 100.0% — 1,741 0 0