H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-2

Tomas Berdych and Tommy Haas are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2017 Monte Carlo Masters third round 3-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 19, 2017* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tomas Berdych #12 3-6 6-1 6-4 Tommy Haas #655 Match data
Jun 16, 2012* Halle ATP 500 QF Grass Tommy Haas #87 6-4 3-6 7-5 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Jul 2, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tomas Berdych #14 2-6 7-5 7-6(7) 4-6 8-6 Tommy Haas #24 Match data
Sep 8, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Tommy Haas #45 7-6(6) 6-1 7-5 Tomas Berdych #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15