H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 6-1

Tomas Berdych holds a 6–1 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2018 Rotterdam fourth round 6-1 6-2.

CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
6 1
7 main draw meetings
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2018* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #17 6-1 6-2 Viktor Troicki #67 Match data
Jan 25, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-4 6-3 6-4 Viktor Troicki #54 Match data
Oct 3, 2014* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 6-3 6-4 Viktor Troicki #152 Match data
Jun 15, 2012* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Tomas Berdych #7 6-3 6-2 Viktor Troicki #33 Match data
Jun 11, 2011* Halle ATP 500 QF Grass Tomas Berdych #7 7-6(3) 6-1 Viktor Troicki #12 Match data
Mar 18, 2010* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #25 6-1 6-3 Viktor Troicki #35 Match data
Mar 15, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Viktor Troicki #41 6-3 6-1 Tomas Berdych #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,008 268 256 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,786 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,803 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,935 0 1
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2012 21–26 44.7% #38 1,769 0 1
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2013 16–17 48.5% #75 1,823 0 1
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,844 0 2
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2016 33–27 55.0% #29 1,895 0 3
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,647 0 3
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,635 0 3
34 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,634 0 3
35 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,643 0 3