H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 3-1
Tomas Berdych holds a 3–1 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2014 Cincinnati Masters third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2014* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2014* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2013* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(7) 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2012* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tomas Berdych | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |