H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Tomas Carbonell vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 2-1
Tomas Carbonell holds a 2–1 lead over Arnaud Boetsch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 2–0 on clay, while Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1997 Prague third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1997* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 6-4 6-3 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1992* | Bastad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1991* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-4 6-1 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Arnaud Boetsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |