H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-4

Cedric Pioline holds a 4–1 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1995 Lyon fourth round 6-2 6-2.

ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 20, 1995* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Cedric Pioline #56 6-2 6-2 Tomas Carbonell #73 Match data
Oct 22, 1992* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #46 6-0 7-5 Tomas Carbonell #63 Match data
Apr 22, 1992* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tomas Carbonell #78 4-6 6-2 6-2 Cedric Pioline #55 Match data
Oct 17, 1991* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #49 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 Tomas Carbonell #82 Match data
Jun 21, 1990* Genova ATP 250 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #149 6-4 6-7 7-6 Tomas Carbonell #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5