H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-1

Tomas Carbonell and Diego Nargiso are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Diego Nargiso leads 1–0 on carpet, while Tomas Carbonell leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1995 Palermo third round 7-5 4-6 7-5.

ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 28, 1995* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay Tomas Carbonell #81 7-5 4-6 7-5 Diego Nargiso #164 Match data
Feb 5, 1994* Marseille ATP 250 QF Carpet Diego Nargiso #121 6-1 7-6(7) Tomas Carbonell #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0 1988 10–12 45.5% #90 1,621 0 0
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,590 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,618 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,603 0 0
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,596 0 0
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,525 0 0
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,530 0 0
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,528 0 0
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,524 0 0
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,612 0 0