H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 0-1

Fabrice Santoro holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 1991 Indianapolis second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 1991 Indianapolis ATP 250 R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #40 6-2 6-2 Tomas Carbonell #72 Match data

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6