H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 0-1

Fernando Vicente holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 1998 Mallorca quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Fernando Vicente
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Vicente #78 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Tomas Carbonell #204 Match data Oct 3, 1998* QF Mallorca ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 159 213 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Fernando Vicente
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,561 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,649 0 0
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,636 0 1
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1 2000 24–32 42.9% #47 1,618 0 2
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,638 0 3
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,601 0 3
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,594 0 3
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,507 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,482 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,488 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Carbonell Fernando Vicente
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 — — — — 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — —
21 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 19 17 36 52.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 7 9 16 43.8% 16 15 31 51.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 2003 7 12 19 36.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2004 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
28 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2005 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
29 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8% — 39 64 103 37.9% 113 128 241 46.9% 5 12 17 29.4% 2 9 11 18.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's and 327/372 of Fernando Vicente's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Carbonell Fernando Vicente
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 4/6 1.0 2.0 70.7% 62.9% 53.7% 34.5% 38.4% 59.4% 45.4%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 18/21 1.1 2.7 62.5% 64.6% 47.0% 58.3% 48.0% 57.7% 45.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 32/40 2.2 2.7 61.9% 62.8% 50.4% 55.1% 44.5% 58.1% 40.8%
22 1991 37/40 2.4 2.3 65.9% 62.7% 47.5% 45.4% 50.6% 57.7% 39.2% 1999 47/54 2.3 3.2 59.8% 66.6% 48.9% 55.3% 46.2% 59.5% 42.0%
23 1992 35/40 1.6 5.2 69.1% 63.1% 38.6% 51.2% 47.0% 55.5% 43.3% 2000 44/56 3.0 3.7 59.2% 66.8% 49.6% 53.0% 41.6% 60.0% 38.9%
24 1993 40/46 2.1 5.1 68.3% 63.7% 44.2% 56.1% 43.8% 57.4% 42.4% 2001 43/49 3.7 3.6 57.7% 69.0% 47.2% 52.5% 48.3% 59.3% 39.6%
25 1994 50/55 2.0 4.4 70.1% 63.6% 44.7% 52.9% 47.6% 58.0% 42.8% 2002 44/51 3.2 1.9 57.4% 67.3% 50.1% 58.6% 46.0% 59.9% 37.2%
26 1995 47/52 3.5 3.5 64.2% 66.0% 46.7% 50.6% 43.9% 58.7% 41.6% 2003 49/49 4.6 2.6 56.4% 68.0% 48.1% 59.2% 43.5% 59.1% 34.8%
27 1996 44/46 3.6 3.1 65.8% 65.9% 47.9% 55.4% 46.3% 59.2% 38.4% 2004 9/9 2.8 1.8 58.8% 63.6% 44.2% 55.6% 42.7% 55.7% 35.8%
28 1997 19/21 3.8 4.0 65.4% 66.2% 44.8% 47.9% 57.5% 59.0% 42.0% 2005 8/8 4.4 2.3 56.9% 64.0% 51.0% 64.0% 35.5% 58.2% 40.7%
29 1998 10/10 4.2 3.9 62.4% 66.0% 45.4% 55.0% 38.8% 58.0% 40.4% 2006 22/22 3.0 1.6 64.9% 63.7% 50.1% 53.1% 39.1% 58.8% 36.7%
30 1999 1/2 0.0 4.0 77.3% 51.7% 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 50.7% 33.3% 2007 5/5 1.4 1.2 70.3% 56.6% 39.1% 52.8% 24.0% 51.3% 25.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 50.0% 61.8% 44.1% 50.0% 28.6% 52.9% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 62.2% 30.4% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 29.7% 27.8%
Career — 283/415 2.7 3.9 67.0% 64.4% 45.1% 51.9% 46.9% 57.9% 41.3% — 327/372 3.0 2.8 59.5% 66.1% 48.7% 55.4% 43.9% 58.9% 38.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Carbonell Fernando Vicente
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1481 99.8 — — — — — +28 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1559 121.2 — — — — — +30 — 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1574 120.3 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.60 1996 1548 120.0 +0.84 +2.51 1.118 52.2% — +29 — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.41
20 1989 1624 135.5 — — — — -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 96.3 +0.46 1997 1562 130.5 -1.52 +3.50 1.070 51.3% — +52 — 44.4% -0.33 1–6 (14%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.43
21 1990 1709 141.7 — — — — -128 +42 — 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) 99.7 -0.63 1998 1650 137.4 -2.98 +1.59 0.974 49.6% -108 +65 — 44.3% -0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 103.1 -0.14
22 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 — 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) 90.5 -2.85 1999 1637 138.5 -1.44 +2.23 1.037 50.6% -86 +109 — 45.6% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 7–12 (37%) 98.8 +0.65
23 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 — 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) 110.9 +0.61 2000 1618 135.8 -1.81 +1.17 0.972 49.6% -34 +61 — 44.7% -0.20 13–15 (46%) 10–12 (45%) 100.4 -0.23
24 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 — 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 96.1 -1.48 2001 1639 132.0 -1.82 +1.08 0.972 49.5% -18 +32 — 45.5% -0.38 10–9 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 103.8 +0.90
25 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 — 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +0.63 2002 1618 136.2 -2.20 -0.59 0.927 48.9% +13 +77 — 46.2% -0.27 8–8 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 0.00
26 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) 104.5 -0.06 2003 1602 129.5 -1.76 -2.08 0.852 47.4% +2 +46 -97 41.3% -0.65 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 104.2 -2.16
27 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) 107.4 -0.23 2004 1594 106.7 -3.53 -0.58 0.807 45.9% — +61 — 41.7% -1.33 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 102.1 +0.13
28 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 — 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 97.4 +0.37 2005 1614 114.5 -1.62 +0.57 0.973 49.5% — +61 — 41.7% -0.25 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.35
29 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 — 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 102.0 -0.26 2006 1462 116.7 -2.31 -0.86 0.891 47.8% +46 +92 +90 32.1% -1.21 0–8 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 90.0 +0.66
30 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.25 2007 1508 103.6 -3.76 -5.30 0.523 39.6% — 0 — 7.7% -3.62 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1483 99.3 -2.70 -2.66 0.907 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1488 93.1 -1.57 -0.72 0.395 28.8% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.06
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1471 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58 — 1763 134.5 -1.98 +0.46 0.943 49.0% -22 +64 -35 43.1% -0.44 63–68 (48%) 62–72 (46%) 98.5 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.