H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 2-1

Tomas Carbonell holds a 2–1 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Tomas Carbonell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1996 Geneva Open round of 16 4-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillaume Raoux #70 4-6 6-2 6-1 Tomas Carbonell #76 Match data Feb 2, 1996* R16 Geneva Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Tomas Carbonell #64 6-0 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #135 Match data Mar 9, 1995* R32 Copenhagen ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Tomas Carbonell #78 6-7(0) 6-4 6-3 Guillaume Raoux #93 Match data Oct 3, 1991* R32 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,808 175 223 44.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Guillaume Raoux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,493 0 0
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,616 0 0
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,573 0 1
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,567 0 1
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1 1996 21–22 48.8% #72 1,621 0 1
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,578 0 1
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Carbonell Guillaume Raoux
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 16 20 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
22 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0%
24 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1996 10 12 22 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
27 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 12 14 26 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 16 13 29 55.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
29 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8% — 94 112 206 45.6% 14 36 50 28.0% 21 27 48 43.8% 46 48 94 48.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's and 339/375 of Guillaume Raoux's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Carbonell Guillaume Raoux
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 37/39 5.7 3.5 51.1% 72.6% 48.3% 53.7% 42.7% 60.7% 36.1%
22 1991 37/40 2.4 2.3 65.9% 62.7% 47.5% 45.4% 50.6% 57.7% 39.2% 1992 28/30 4.3 3.3 52.5% 71.6% 50.9% 61.6% 49.3% 61.8% 37.9%
23 1992 35/40 1.6 5.2 69.1% 63.1% 38.6% 51.2% 47.0% 55.5% 43.3% 1993 48/55 4.8 2.9 51.0% 74.0% 52.3% 58.5% 44.4% 63.1% 39.3%
24 1993 40/46 2.1 5.1 68.3% 63.7% 44.2% 56.1% 43.8% 57.4% 42.4% 1994 34/35 4.2 3.2 52.9% 72.1% 48.9% 54.2% 36.7% 61.2% 36.4%
25 1994 50/55 2.0 4.4 70.1% 63.6% 44.7% 52.9% 47.6% 58.0% 42.8% 1995 38/39 5.1 2.9 50.3% 72.5% 50.6% 58.8% 45.0% 61.8% 35.5%
26 1995 47/52 3.5 3.5 64.2% 66.0% 46.7% 50.6% 43.9% 58.7% 41.6% 1996 36/43 6.3 2.9 51.8% 75.4% 53.5% 59.8% 46.9% 65.0% 35.4%
27 1996 44/46 3.6 3.1 65.8% 65.9% 47.9% 55.4% 46.3% 59.2% 38.4% 1997 45/52 5.2 2.7 55.6% 74.8% 53.4% 55.0% 38.6% 65.6% 35.4%
28 1997 19/21 3.8 4.0 65.4% 66.2% 44.8% 47.9% 57.5% 59.0% 42.0% 1998 45/51 3.7 2.4 55.7% 70.5% 53.7% 63.3% 39.9% 63.2% 33.6%
29 1998 10/10 4.2 3.9 62.4% 66.0% 45.4% 55.0% 38.8% 58.0% 40.4% 1999 26/29 4.9 3.7 50.3% 70.5% 53.1% 61.5% 36.8% 61.8% 32.0%
30 1999 1/2 0.0 4.0 77.3% 51.7% 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 50.7% 33.3% 2000 2/2 5.5 2.5 51.7% 70.6% 55.9% 75.0% 21.6% 63.6% 35.1%
Career — 283/415 2.7 3.9 67.0% 64.4% 45.1% 51.9% 46.9% 57.9% 41.3% — 339/398 4.9 3.0 52.5% 72.8% 51.8% 58.5% 42.1% 62.9% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Carbonell Guillaume Raoux
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1481 99.8 — — — — — +28 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1559 121.2 — — — — — +30 — 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 — -0.21 1988 1493 101.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.12
19 1988 1574 120.3 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.60 1989 1463 110.5 — — — — +66 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–1 0–2 — -0.21
20 1989 1624 135.5 — — — — -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.46 1990 1530 117.3 — — — — +46 — +38 45.0% -0.22 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.60
21 1990 1709 141.7 — — — — -128 +42 — 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.63 1991 1617 126.4 +0.36 -2.95 0.919 48.7% -14 — -57 38.5% -0.57 6–7 (46%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.55
22 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 — 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) — -2.85 1992 1620 126.0 -0.28 +0.33 0.993 50.1% 0 — -46 48.6% +0.11 2–6 (25%) 1–8 (11%) — +1.27
23 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 — 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.61 1993 1628 138.5 +1.31 +1.04 1.066 51.2% +27 -183 -16 51.8% +0.17 5–13 (28%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.69
24 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 — 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.48 1994 1573 130.1 -0.73 -1.57 0.936 48.9% +66 -127 +7 43.7% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.24
25 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 — 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.63 1995 1567 120.6 -0.21 -2.56 0.930 48.9% +49 -88 -28 44.2% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.91
26 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.06 1996 1621 132.1 +2.42 -1.48 1.013 50.4% +23 -150 -47 50.0% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.30
27 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.23 1997 1729 142.3 +2.81 -1.42 1.030 50.7% -9 -216 -38 54.5% +0.22 4–7 (36%) 17–8 (68%) — -0.78
28 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 — 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.37 1998 1736 144.0 +1.79 -2.65 0.911 48.6% +35 -207 -109 50.4% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 23–9 (72%) — -2.53
29 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 — 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26 1999 1578 127.4 +0.36 -4.10 0.838 47.6% +71 — — 38.9% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.04
30 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.25 2000 1554 113.4 -1.28 -1.62 0.966 48.4% — — — 28.6% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.02
Career — 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58 — 1808 138.0 +0.99 -1.61 0.965 49.6% +27 -165 -34 46.7% -0.22 45–72 (38%) 92–82 (53%) 100.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.