H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Carbonell vs Hendrik Dreekmann H2H: 1-1
Tomas Carbonell and Hendrik Dreekmann are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 1–0 on carpet, while Hendrik Dreekmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hendrik Dreekmann won the 1997 Marseille fourth round 1-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1997* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Hendrik Dreekmann | 1-6 7-5 6-1 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1994* | Zaragoza | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tomas Carbonell | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Hendrik Dreekmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hendrik Dreekmann | #1,171 | #39 | 1,013 | 1,786 | 95 | 116 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Hendrik Dreekmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #64 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #93 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #129 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #880 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #888 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |