H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Carbonell vs Horacio de la Pena H2H: 3-1
Tomas Carbonell holds a 3–1 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1994 Bastad third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1994* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 6-1 6-1 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| May 21, 1992* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1990* | Athens | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 6-1 6-4 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1986* | Bari | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 6-1 6-4 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Horacio de la Pena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |