H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 2-2

Tomas Carbonell and Jaime Oncins are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 2–1 on clay, while Jaime Oncins leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1993 Stuttgart Open round of 64 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Jaime Oncins
BRA Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Carbonell #97 7-5 6-3 Jaime Oncins #75 Match data Jul 21, 1993* R64 Stuttgart Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Tomas Carbonell #93 6-3 6-1 Jaime Oncins #37 Match data Apr 30, 1993* R16 Madrid ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Oncins #74 6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 Tomas Carbonell #87 Match data Nov 8, 1991* R16 Sao Paulo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Oncins #92 7-6(4) 6-2 Tomas Carbonell #81 Match data May 23, 1991* R32 Bologna ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jaime Oncins #1,034 #34 773 1,810 64 87 42.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Jaime Oncins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0 1988 1–2 33.3% #314 1,493 0 0
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #263 1,470 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0 1990 0–4 0.0% #113 1,442 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0 1991 22–17 56.4% #64 1,677 0 0
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0 1992 27–19 58.7% #48 1,778 0 2
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1 1993 11–23 32.4% #133 1,584 0 2
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1 1994 1–7 12.5% #230 1,505 0 2
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1 1995 1–2 33.3% #222 1,508 0 2
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1 1996 0–2 0.0% #160 1,491 0 2
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2 1997 0–6 0.0% #166 1,439 0 2
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 1998 1–2 33.3% #223 1,451 0 2
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,438 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Carbonell Jaime Oncins
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — — — — —
23 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 7 15 22 31.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8% — 32 42 74 43.2% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's and 125/142 of Jaime Oncins's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Carbonell Jaime Oncins
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 35/39 3.2 2.6 55.4% 69.9% 50.1% 49.9% 43.4% 61.0% 41.7%
22 1991 37/40 2.4 2.3 65.9% 62.7% 47.5% 45.4% 50.6% 57.7% 39.2% 1992 42/46 3.0 3.8 55.5% 69.7% 45.7% 54.9% 43.5% 59.3% 42.8%
23 1992 35/40 1.6 5.2 69.1% 63.1% 38.6% 51.2% 47.0% 55.5% 43.3% 1993 29/34 2.9 4.4 58.2% 66.6% 40.7% 51.5% 42.1% 55.8% 40.6%
24 1993 40/46 2.1 5.1 68.3% 63.7% 44.2% 56.1% 43.8% 57.4% 42.4% 1994 6/8 2.2 9.0 57.5% 65.4% 40.9% 63.4% 41.9% 55.0% 39.7%
25 1994 50/55 2.0 4.4 70.1% 63.6% 44.7% 52.9% 47.6% 58.0% 42.8% 1995 3/3 3.0 5.3 60.8% 70.0% 43.9% 63.0% 24.5% 59.4% 39.6%
26 1995 47/52 3.5 3.5 64.2% 66.0% 46.7% 50.6% 43.9% 58.7% 41.6% 1996 2/2 1.5 18.5 45.0% 69.3% 28.9% 47.3% 28.6% 47.0% 43.5%
27 1996 44/46 3.6 3.1 65.8% 65.9% 47.9% 55.4% 46.3% 59.2% 38.4% 1997 6/6 3.0 9.7 51.8% 67.9% 35.1% 48.8% 61.9% 52.0% 35.0%
28 1997 19/21 3.8 4.0 65.4% 66.2% 44.8% 47.9% 57.5% 59.0% 42.0% 1998 1/3 4.0 8.0 57.7% 66.7% 31.8% 33.3% 33.3% 51.9% 35.1%
29 1998 10/10 4.2 3.9 62.4% 66.0% 45.4% 55.0% 38.8% 58.0% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1/2 0.0 4.0 77.3% 51.7% 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 50.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 1/1 3.0 13.0 56.5% 63.9% 46.8% 60.0% 50.0% 56.5% 39.3%
Career — 283/415 2.7 3.9 67.0% 64.4% 45.1% 51.9% 46.9% 57.9% 41.3% — 125/151 3.0 4.5 56.0% 68.7% 44.6% 52.8% 43.3% 58.1% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Carbonell Jaime Oncins
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1481 99.8 — — — — — +28 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1559 121.2 — — — — — +30 — 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 — -0.21 1988 1493 95.3 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.86 0–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.30
19 1988 1574 120.3 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.60 1989 1471 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19
20 1989 1624 135.5 — — — — -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.46 1990 1442 102.8 — — — — +19 — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — -0.15
21 1990 1709 141.7 — — — — -128 +42 — 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.63 1991 1677 121.5 +0.13 +1.64 1.068 51.1% -83 -50 -66 55.6% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.89
22 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 — 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) — -2.85 1992 1778 131.6 -1.02 +2.52 1.052 50.9% -123 +21 — 58.1% +0.28 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.08
23 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 — 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.61 1993 1584 130.7 -3.35 +1.16 0.920 48.2% +18 +63 — 39.3% -0.56 5–11 (31%) 2–9 (18%) — -0.21
24 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 — 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.48 1994 1506 104.0 -2.79 -0.18 0.883 47.5% +74 +44 — 36.4% -0.86 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.29
25 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 — 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.63 1995 1509 108.4 +0.94 -0.26 0.977 49.5% — +44 — 33.3% -0.50 — — — -0.02
26 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.06 1996 1491 108.9 +1.07 +2.59 0.821 45.2% — — — 28.6% -2.14 0–1 1–1 — -0.08
27 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.23 1997 1439 112.1 -3.40 -1.77 0.729 43.8% +88 +85 — 13.3% -1.93 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
28 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 — 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.37 1998 1451 107.4 -1.60 -1.30 0.730 43.1% +85 — — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–1 — -0.07
29 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 — 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1438 100.2 +0.01 -0.73 0.903 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58 — 1810 127.5 -1.35 +1.50 0.987 49.6% -49 +28 -66 47.0% -0.28 17–39 (30%) 23–23 (50%) 90.4 +1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.