H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 0-1

Jeff Tarango holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1990 Tel Aviv fourth round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 1990* Tel Aviv ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeff Tarango #130 6-2 7-5 Tomas Carbonell #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2