H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 0-1

Jimmy Connors holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jimmy Connors leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1992 Miami Masters second round 6-7(6) 6-2 7-6(0).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 1992* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jimmy Connors #36 6-7(6) 6-2 7-6(0) Tomas Carbonell #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 — — — — — — — 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109