H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tomas Carbonell vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 2-0
Tomas Carbonell holds a 2–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1992 Maceio semifinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1992* | Maceio | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 6-4 7-5 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1988* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 6-2 7-5 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |