H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Carbonell vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 3-1
Tomas Carbonell holds a 3–1 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1995 Stuttgart Outdoor third round 6-4 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1995* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1994* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paul Haarhuis | 7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1991* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Carbonell | 6-2 6-4 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tomas Carbonell | 6-7 7-6 6-4 6-0 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |