H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 3-1

Tomas Carbonell holds a 3–1 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1995 Nice fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 21, 1995* Nice ATP 250 R16 Clay Tomas Carbonell #73 6-4 6-4 Renzo Furlan #61 Match data
Aug 5, 1994* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Tomas Carbonell #62 2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Renzo Furlan #39 Match data
Mar 19, 1994* Casablanca ATP 250 QF Clay Renzo Furlan #45 4-2 (ret.) Tomas Carbonell #84 Match data
Apr 16, 1992* Nice ATP 250 R32 Clay Tomas Carbonell #82 5-7 6-4 6-3 Renzo Furlan #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,844 209 231 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Renzo Furlan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0 1992 24–28 46.2% #53 1,667 0 0
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,681 0 0
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,682 0 2
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,727 0 2
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1 1996 29–26 52.7% #40 1,695 0 2
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,580 0 2
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,548 0 2