H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tomas Carbonell vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 0-1
Richey Reneberg holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1991 Miami Masters fourth round 7-6(1) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1991* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Richey Reneberg | 7-6(1) 7-6(3) | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Richey Reneberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |