H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Tomas Carbonell holds a 3–0 lead over Roberto Azar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1992 Genova round of 32 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | 6-1 6-1 | Roberto Azar | Match data | Jun 18, 1992* | R32 | Genova | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Tomas Carbonell | 7-6 3-6 6-3 | Roberto Azar | Match data | Jul 26, 1990* | R32 | Dutch Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Tomas Carbonell | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | Roberto Azar | Match data | Mar 10, 1990* | QF | Casablanca | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,777 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Roberto Azar | #1,228 | #81 | 455 | 1,684 | 49 | 90 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Roberto Azar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #257 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #106 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #93 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #96 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #238 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Roberto Azar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1990 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1994 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 21 | 17 | 38 | 55.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1991 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 21 | 19 | 40 | 52.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1992 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 15 | 21 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 15 | 18 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 31 | 49 | 80 | 38.8% | 141 | 133 | 274 | 51.5% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 16 | 30 | 46 | 34.8% | — | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 48 | 75 | 123 | 39.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's and 62/66 of Roberto Azar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Roberto Azar | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | 1991 | 37/40 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 65.9% | 62.7% | 47.5% | 45.4% | 50.6% | 57.7% | 39.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 35/40 | 1.6 | 5.2 | 69.1% | 63.1% | 38.6% | 51.2% | 47.0% | 55.5% | 43.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 40/46 | 2.1 | 5.1 | 68.3% | 63.7% | 44.2% | 56.1% | 43.8% | 57.4% | 42.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 50/55 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 70.1% | 63.6% | 44.7% | 52.9% | 47.6% | 58.0% | 42.8% | 1991 | 21/21 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 72.2% | 60.1% | 48.5% | 45.4% | 50.3% | 56.7% | 38.2% |
| 26 | 1995 | 47/52 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 64.2% | 66.0% | 46.7% | 50.6% | 43.9% | 58.7% | 41.6% | 1992 | 24/26 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 65.1% | 58.7% | 43.4% | 51.5% | 38.8% | 53.4% | 36.1% |
| 27 | 1996 | 44/46 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 65.8% | 65.9% | 47.9% | 55.4% | 46.3% | 59.2% | 38.4% | 1993 | 17/19 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 68.1% | 58.8% | 38.8% | 52.8% | 41.6% | 52.6% | 32.8% |
| 28 | 1997 | 19/21 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 65.4% | 66.2% | 44.8% | 47.9% | 57.5% | 59.0% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 10/10 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 62.4% | 66.0% | 45.4% | 55.0% | 38.8% | 58.0% | 40.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 1/2 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 77.3% | 51.7% | 47.1% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.7% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 283/415 | 2.7 | 3.9 | 67.0% | 64.4% | 45.1% | 51.9% | 46.9% | 57.9% | 41.3% | — | 62/139 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 68.4% | 59.2% | 43.9% | 49.8% | 43.5% | 54.3% | 35.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Roberto Azar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1481 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 36.4% | -0.91 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 1559 | 121.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | 47.4% | -0.89 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 1574 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +79 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 1624 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -172 | +101 | -3 | 50.0% | +0.04 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +0.46 | 1986 | 1505 | 109.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | 42.9% | -1.57 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.06 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1709 | 141.7 | — | — | — | — | -128 | +42 | — | 52.7% | +0.34 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–6 (54%) | — | -0.63 | 1987 | 1481 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1624 | 131.0 | -2.01 | +0.62 | 0.927 | 48.4% | -30 | +35 | — | 40.2% | -0.52 | 4–9 (31%) | 4–11 (27%) | — | -2.85 | 1988 | 1483 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | 40.0% | -0.90 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 23 | 1992 | 1660 | 134.9 | -4.31 | +2.88 | 0.973 | 49.4% | -103 | +102 | — | 45.7% | -0.28 | 12–3 (80%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +0.61 | 1989 | 1539 | 114.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | 46.2% | -0.54 | 7–4 (64%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +2.54 |
| 24 | 1993 | 1582 | 138.9 | -2.57 | +2.91 | 0.995 | 49.8% | -40 | +125 | — | 43.7% | -0.34 | 7–12 (37%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | -1.48 | 1990 | 1525 | 131.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +103 | — | 47.6% | -0.28 | 4–9 (31%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +0.88 |
| 25 | 1994 | 1640 | 136.7 | -2.35 | +2.94 | 1.018 | 50.4% | -88 | +89 | — | 52.6% | +0.08 | 11–12 (48%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | +0.63 | 1991 | 1527 | 117.6 | -2.13 | -0.95 | 0.882 | 47.6% | -94 | +114 | — | 36.5% | -0.81 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +1.24 |
| 26 | 1995 | 1679 | 133.7 | -1.80 | +2.24 | 1.008 | 50.0% | -117 | +39 | -53 | 47.0% | -0.10 | 14–6 (70%) | 5–9 (36%) | — | -0.06 | 1992 | 1493 | 108.8 | -4.51 | -3.47 | 0.775 | 44.9% | -60 | +49 | — | 31.3% | -1.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +0.15 |
| 27 | 1996 | 1584 | 131.9 | -1.67 | -0.34 | 0.941 | 48.7% | -22 | +61 | +63 | 43.9% | -0.49 | 11–5 (69%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -0.23 | 1993 | 1417 | 106.6 | -4.91 | -3.64 | 0.693 | 42.9% | — | +26 | — | 21.3% | -1.79 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–6 (14%) | — | +0.40 |
| 28 | 1997 | 1576 | 125.5 | -1.64 | +1.61 | 1.024 | 50.3% | -5 | +73 | — | 45.3% | +0.02 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 1619 | 127.2 | -1.06 | +0.30 | 0.963 | 49.4% | -14 | +45 | — | 48.3% | -0.04 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 1580 | 98.3 | +1.26 | -0.69 | 0.676 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1777 | 140.3 | -2.28 | +1.80 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -61 | +72 | +2 | 46.9% | -0.17 | 78–74 (51%) | 55–65 (46%) | 101.9 | -0.58 | — | 1684 | 120.5 | -3.81 | -2.66 | 0.786 | 45.3% | -69 | +62 | — | 38.2% | -0.89 | 23–29 (44%) | 23–25 (48%) | 97.4 | +3.92 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Gustafsson | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 1, 1998 | H2H |
| Francisco Clavet | 1 | 7 | 8 | Apr 16, 1997 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 20, 1996 | H2H |
| Sergi Bruguera | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 5, 1998 | H2H |
| Carlos Costa | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 21, 1995 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 30, 1993 | H2H |
| Goran Prpic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 7, 1993 | H2H |
| Bart Wuyts | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 18, 1993 | H2H |
| Jaime Oncins | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 12, 1992 | H2H |
| Tomas Carbonell | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 18, 1992 | H2H |