H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Ronnie Bathman H2H: 1-0

Tomas Carbonell holds a 1–0 lead over Ronnie Bathman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Carbonell leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1987 Roland Garros round of 128 5-7 7-5 7-6 6-3.

ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
SWE Age 67 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Carbonell #444 5-7 7-5 7-6 6-3 Ronnie Bathman #261 Match data May 27, 1987* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ronnie Bathman #650 #139 56 1,533 9 26 25.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Ronnie Bathman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1 1982 1–1 50.0% #662 1,517 0 0
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1 1983 1–1 50.0% #450 1,520 0 0
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% #370 1,498 0 0
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2 1986 2–8 20.0% #186 1,447 0 0
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 1987 1–3 25.0% #275 1,422 0 0
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2 1988 2–7 22.2% #250 1,410 0 0
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2 1989 2–3 40.0% #324 1,454 0 0
31 1990 0–2 0.0% #449 1,425 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Carbonell Ronnie Bathman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1987 4 3 7 57.1%
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
20 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
28 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
30 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 4 15 19 21.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Carbonell Ronnie Bathman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1481 99.8 +28 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) +0.40
18 1987 1559 121.2 +30 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 -0.21
19 1988 1574 120.3 +79 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 +0.60
20 1989 1624 135.5 -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) +0.46
21 1990 1709 141.7 -128 +42 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) -0.63
22 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) -2.85
23 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) +0.61 1982 1517 106.7 50.0% -0.75 -0.08
24 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) -1.48 1983 1520 104.7 50.0% +1.00 0–2 +0.36
25 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) +0.63 1984 1499 99.1 25.0% -2.00 +0.20
26 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) -0.06
27 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) -0.23 1986 1447 106.4 +95 +39 30.8% -0.92 2–4 (33%) 0–2 +0.98
28 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) +0.37 1987 1422 96.8 +103 27.3% -1.09 1–0 1–1 +0.64
29 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) -0.26 1988 1410 107.8 +47 36.4% -1.23 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) +0.39
30 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% 20.0% -1.80 0–1 +0.25 1989 1454 117.7 47.1% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) -0.08
31 1990 1425 97.9 28.6% -1.00 0–1 +0.25
Career 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58 1534 110.9 +99 +43 35.8% -0.89 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 95.1 +7.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.