H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tomas Machac vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 0-1
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Machac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2022 US Open first round 3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 25
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 3-6 7-5 | Tomas Machac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Machac | #53 | #20 | 2,330 | 1,989 | 75 | 63 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Machac | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2023 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2024 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #25 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |