H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:33 UTC
Tomas Machac vs Daniel Altmaier H2H: 2-0
Tomas Machac holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Altmaier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Machac leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Machac won the 2026 Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters second round 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 25
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Germany
Age 27
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026 | Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tomas Machac | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Daniel Altmaier | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2025* | Abierto Mexicano Telcel Presentado Por HSBC | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Machac | 7-6 6-1 | Daniel Altmaier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Machac | #53 | #20 | 2,330 | 1,989 | 75 | 63 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Daniel Altmaier | #60 | #44 | 1,148 | 1,750 | 74 | 127 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Machac | Daniel Altmaier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #25 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #94 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #56 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #60 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |