H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Tomas Machac vs Matteo Berrettini H2H: 0-1
Matteo Berrettini holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Machac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matteo Berrettini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2021 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 25
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Matteo Berrettini | 6-3 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Tomas Machac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Machac | #53 | #20 | 2,330 | 1,989 | 75 | 63 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Machac | Matteo Berrettini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2024 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #25 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2026 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 |