H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:33 UTC
Tomas Machac vs Quentin Halys H2H: 1-1
Tomas Machac and Quentin Halys are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Quentin Halys leads 1–0 on clay, while Tomas Machac leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Machac won the 2026 Adelaide International fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 25
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
France
Age 29
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | Adelaide International | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Machac | 6-4 6-2 | Quentin Halys | Match data |
| May 27, 2025* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Quentin Halys | 7-6 4-1 | Tomas Machac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Machac | #53 | #20 | 2,330 | 1,989 | 75 | 63 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Quentin Halys | #90 | #46 | 1,174 | 1,815 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Machac | Quentin Halys | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #129 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #25 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #64 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #100 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #72 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |