H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 0-3

Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 3–0 lead over Tomas Martin Etcheverry in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2023 Rio Open first round 5-7 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Argentina Age 27 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #47 5-7 6-4 6-4 Tomas Martin Etcheverry #75 Match data Feb 23, 2023* R32 Rio Open ATP 500 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #38 6-3 6-3 Tomas Martin Etcheverry #78 Match data Jul 14, 2022* R32 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #47 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 Tomas Martin Etcheverry #234 Match data Feb 26, 2021* R16 Cordoba ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Martin Etcheverry #32 #25 1,660 1,885 108 120 47.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Albert Ramos-Vinolas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2021 1–2 33.3% #130 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2022 3–14 17.6% #79 1,519 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0
23 2023 29–27 51.8% #30 1,771 0 0 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0
24 2024 29–28 50.9% #39 1,784 0 0 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0
25 2025 22–28 44.0% #59 1,750 0 0 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0
26 2026 24–21 53.3% #32 1,729 0 1 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2023 9 13 22 40.9% 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — —
24 2024 10 14 24 41.7% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2025 12 12 24 50.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2026 6 8 14 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 39 53 92 42.4% 65 54 119 54.6% 4 13 17 23.5% — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 224/230 of Tomas Martin Etcheverry's and 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2021 3/3 3.3 1.0 72.3% 66.9% 47.0% 45.3% 32.0% 61.8% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2022 17/17 4.0 2.6 67.2% 63.0% 47.8% 48.2% 36.6% 58.3% 31.5% 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1%
23 2023 56/56 6.2 1.7 64.3% 71.4% 53.4% 60.1% 39.0% 64.7% 37.7% 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0%
24 2024 55/57 6.8 1.7 65.5% 72.7% 50.3% 60.6% 40.9% 64.8% 36.9% 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7%
25 2025 48/50 6.6 1.7 62.6% 71.7% 50.6% 59.9% 38.0% 63.8% 36.1% 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6%
26 2026 45/47 5.8 1.9 64.5% 72.5% 54.5% 50.5% 37.5% 66.1% 34.8% 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5%
Career — 224/230 6.2 1.8 64.6% 71.3% 51.8% 57.2% 38.7% 64.3% 36.1% — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2020 1482 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 1506 109.0 +1.47 -1.14 1.006 49.6% — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.39 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2022 1519 114.7 -3.40 -3.65 0.755 45.2% -2 +69 — 24.4% -1.67 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.87 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
23 2023 1772 148.1 +1.24 +1.26 1.068 51.0% -110 +51 -222 51.4% +0.20 11–11 (50%) 12–19 (39%) — -0.07 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23
24 2024 1784 150.6 +0.03 +1.39 1.049 50.9% -44 +89 -252 52.1% +0.21 7–12 (37%) 13–17 (43%) — +0.68 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55
25 2025 1751 140.7 +0.17 -0.20 0.999 49.9% -1 +13 -216 46.0% -0.06 8–9 (47%) 10–16 (38%) — -0.37 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49
26 2026 1730 141.0 +1.78 -0.35 1.028 50.1% +13 +86 -240 50.4% -0.08 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) — +0.85 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39
Career — 1886 144.2 +0.47 +0.25 1.012 50.1% -37 +64 -231 48.0% -0.06 40–43 (48%) 53–67 (44%) 100.2 +1.03 — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.