H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 0-3
Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 3–0 lead over Tomas Martin Etcheverry in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2023 Rio de Janeiro third round 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2023* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2022* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-3 6-3 | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2021* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | #30 | #25 | 1,660 | 1,887 | 104 | 115 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #79 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #59 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |