H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Tomas Martin Etcheverry holds a 2–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Martin Etcheverry leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Martin Etcheverry won the 2024 Shanghai Masters second round 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Oct 5, 2024* | R64 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Jul 19, 2024* | R16 | Swiss Open Gstaad | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | #32 | #25 | 1,660 | 1,885 | 109 | 120 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #79 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #59 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #32 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #70 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 21 | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 40 | 53 | 93 | 43.0% | 65 | 54 | 119 | 54.6% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | — | 77 | 76 | 153 | 50.3% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 224/230 of Tomas Martin Etcheverry's and 242/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 2021 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 72.3% | 66.9% | 47.0% | 45.3% | 32.0% | 61.8% | 38.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 17/17 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 67.2% | 63.0% | 47.8% | 48.2% | 36.6% | 58.3% | 31.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 56/56 | 6.2 | 1.7 | 64.3% | 71.4% | 53.4% | 60.1% | 39.0% | 64.7% | 37.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 55/57 | 6.8 | 1.7 | 65.5% | 72.7% | 50.3% | 60.6% | 40.9% | 64.8% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 48/50 | 6.6 | 1.7 | 62.6% | 71.7% | 50.6% | 59.9% | 38.0% | 63.8% | 36.1% | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% |
| 26 | 2026 | 45/47 | 5.8 | 1.9 | 64.5% | 72.5% | 54.5% | 50.5% | 37.5% | 66.1% | 34.8% | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 40/40 | 7.1 | 4.8 | 62.1% | 73.6% | 45.9% | 65.0% | 46.6% | 63.3% | 38.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 2020 | 1482 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1506 | 109.0 | +1.47 | -1.14 | 1.006 | 49.6% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.39 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 1519 | 114.7 | -3.40 | -3.65 | 0.755 | 45.2% | -2 | +69 | — | 24.4% | -1.67 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.87 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1772 | 148.1 | +1.24 | +1.26 | 1.068 | 51.0% | -110 | +51 | -222 | 51.4% | +0.20 | 11–11 (50%) | 12–19 (39%) | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 1784 | 150.6 | +0.03 | +1.39 | 1.049 | 50.9% | -44 | +89 | -252 | 52.1% | +0.21 | 7–12 (37%) | 13–17 (43%) | — | +0.68 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 1751 | 140.7 | +0.17 | -0.20 | 0.999 | 49.9% | -1 | +13 | -216 | 46.0% | -0.06 | 8–9 (47%) | 10–16 (38%) | — | -0.37 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1730 | 141.0 | +1.78 | -0.35 | 1.028 | 50.1% | +13 | +86 | -240 | 50.4% | -0.08 | 12–7 (63%) | 15–11 (58%) | — | +0.85 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1779 | 145.0 | -0.88 | +2.63 | 1.057 | 51.2% | +42 | -74 | -137 | 56.3% | +0.39 | 4–8 (33%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | -0.06 |
| Career | — | 1886 | 144.2 | +0.47 | +0.25 | 1.012 | 50.1% | -37 | +64 | -231 | 48.0% | -0.06 | 40–43 (48%) | 53–67 (44%) | 100.2 | +1.03 | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.90 | +1.98 | 1.006 | 50.0% | +8 | -49 | -86 | 48.9% | -0.06 | 38–38 (50%) | 62–53 (54%) | 105.3 | -2.45 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Cerundolo | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Nicolas Jarry | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 8, 2024 | H2H |
| Nuno Borges | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Miomir Kecmanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jan 18, 2026 | H2H |
| Andy Murray | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 23, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |