H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 2-0
Tomas Martin Etcheverry holds a 2–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Martin Etcheverry leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Martin Etcheverry won the 2024 Shanghai Masters second round 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2024* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2024* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | #30 | #25 | 1,660 | 1,887 | 104 | 115 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #79 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #59 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |