H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 1-0

Tomas Martin Etcheverry holds a 1–0 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Martin Etcheverry leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Martin Etcheverry won the 2023 Chile Open first round 6-1 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Argentina Age 27 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Martin Etcheverry #76 6-1 7-6(1) Fabio Fognini #82 Match data Mar 2, 2023* R32 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Martin Etcheverry #32 #25 1,660 1,885 110 121 47.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 402 385 51.1% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Fabio Fognini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,601 0 0
21 2021 1–2 33.3% #130 1,506 0 0 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,614 0 0
22 2022 3–14 17.6% #79 1,519 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0
23 2023 29–27 51.8% #30 1,771 0 0 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,703 0 0
24 2024 29–28 50.9% #39 1,784 0 0 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,728 0 0
25 2025 22–28 44.0% #59 1,750 0 0 2012 21–24 46.7% #45 1,764 0 0
26 2026 26–22 54.2% #32 1,764 0 1 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,933 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2016 25–22 53.2% #49 1,871 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,946 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,943 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,908 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,799 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–22 47.6% #37 1,773 0 9
35 — — — — — — — 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,703 0 9
36 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,692 0 9
37 — — — — — — — 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,678 0 9
38 — — — — — — — 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,579 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Fabio Fognini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 4 7 11 36.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2023 9 13 22 40.9% 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 3 9 12 25.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2024 10 14 24 41.7% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 5 14 19 26.3% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — —
25 2025 12 12 24 50.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 10 10 20 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2026 8 9 17 47.1% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 27 10 37 73.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 21 11 32 65.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 9 12 21 42.9% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 18 11 29 62.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 22 12 34 64.7% 20 9 29 69.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 13 12 25 52.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 8 12 20 40.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 3 6 9 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 7 9 22.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
Career — 41 54 95 43.2% 65 54 119 54.6% 4 13 17 23.5% — — — — — 151 178 329 45.9% 226 180 406 55.7% 25 26 51 49.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Tomas Martin Etcheverry's and 775/787 of Fabio Fognini's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Fabio Fognini
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 2.0 6.0 69.1% 64.2% 50.0% 55.6% 30.0% 59.8% 35.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 7/7 2.1 2.9 53.1% 65.4% 47.5% 44.2% 54.7% 56.9% 37.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 12/12 4.5 3.8 52.0% 68.2% 44.3% 53.3% 45.5% 56.6% 35.3%
21 2021 3/3 3.3 1.0 72.3% 66.9% 47.0% 45.3% 32.0% 61.8% 38.5% 2008 33/33 3.2 3.9 54.6% 69.4% 46.0% 55.5% 46.4% 58.6% 38.2%
22 2022 17/17 4.0 2.6 67.2% 63.0% 47.8% 48.2% 36.6% 58.3% 31.5% 2009 43/43 3.2 4.0 58.2% 64.4% 45.3% 49.8% 44.0% 56.5% 37.7%
23 2023 56/56 6.2 1.7 64.3% 71.4% 53.4% 60.1% 39.0% 64.7% 37.7% 2010 39/39 2.9 4.8 58.7% 64.9% 43.6% 50.5% 38.7% 56.0% 38.5%
24 2024 55/57 6.8 1.7 65.5% 72.7% 50.3% 60.6% 40.9% 64.8% 36.9% 2011 49/50 3.0 4.6 58.7% 66.2% 45.3% 51.7% 47.8% 57.6% 39.8%
25 2025 48/50 6.6 1.7 62.6% 71.7% 50.6% 59.9% 38.0% 63.8% 36.1% 2012 44/45 2.4 3.0 65.6% 63.4% 48.6% 53.6% 47.1% 58.2% 38.1%
26 2026 48/49 5.9 1.9 64.1% 72.7% 54.4% 49.2% 37.4% 66.0% 35.0% 2013 67/67 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.9% 49.6% 55.8% 45.5% 59.9% 41.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 60/60 3.4 4.0 59.2% 68.8% 48.1% 51.1% 45.7% 60.2% 38.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 55/55 3.4 3.6 58.4% 69.0% 49.3% 57.5% 40.8% 60.8% 39.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 44/47 3.4 4.4 56.0% 69.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.7% 61.1% 39.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 58/58 3.3 4.7 58.8% 69.1% 49.8% 57.4% 42.8% 61.2% 38.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 64/66 3.8 3.5 61.8% 68.9% 52.7% 55.6% 48.5% 62.7% 40.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 51/52 3.9 3.7 60.7% 67.9% 49.0% 53.2% 42.9% 60.3% 38.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 12/12 5.3 4.2 54.5% 67.7% 51.4% 46.1% 48.4% 60.1% 34.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 39/42 3.0 4.3 60.1% 68.4% 48.4% 54.2% 44.8% 60.5% 38.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 42/43 3.3 4.5 59.3% 65.9% 49.0% 57.2% 40.1% 58.9% 36.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 2.9 4.7 60.4% 65.4% 46.8% 49.6% 43.0% 58.1% 39.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 26/26 4.4 4.8 57.8% 67.4% 45.6% 49.9% 43.4% 58.0% 34.9%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 7/7 0.7 5.4 51.9% 62.0% 49.9% 43.4% 24.9% 56.1% 31.4%
Career — 227/232 6.2 1.8 64.5% 71.4% 51.8% 56.8% 38.7% 64.3% 36.1% — 775/787 3.3 4.0 59.0% 67.3% 48.4% 53.5% 44.2% 59.5% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Fabio Fognini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1482 99.2 +0.23 -1.18 0.887 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1477 110.3 -2.63 +0.34 0.866 47.3% — +31 — 35.3% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.8 -0.26
20 2020 1482 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1602 117.2 -2.15 -0.69 0.814 46.3% -46 +18 — 44.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 99.0 +0.25
21 2021 1506 109.0 +1.47 -1.14 1.006 49.6% — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.39 2008 1615 127.2 -3.14 +0.45 0.925 48.6% -103 +155 — 43.4% -0.61 6–5 (55%) 3–8 (27%) 98.2 +0.15
22 2022 1519 114.7 -3.40 -3.65 0.755 45.2% -2 +69 — 24.4% -1.67 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 99.2 +0.87 2009 1716 132.0 -5.36 +0.55 0.866 47.2% -159 +131 -181 37.4% -1.01 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 102.3 -0.90
23 2023 1772 148.1 +1.24 +1.26 1.068 51.0% -110 +51 -222 51.4% +0.20 11–11 (50%) 12–19 (39%) 101.2 -0.07 2010 1704 131.6 -5.15 +1.23 0.875 47.4% -88 +13 -98 37.7% -0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–6 (50%) 104.7 -0.82
24 2024 1784 150.6 +0.03 +1.39 1.049 50.9% -44 +89 -252 52.1% +0.21 7–12 (37%) 13–17 (43%) 96.1 +0.68 2011 1728 142.9 -3.68 +1.72 0.937 48.9% -115 +73 — 48.0% -0.26 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 100.6 +0.45
25 2025 1751 140.7 +0.17 -0.20 0.999 49.9% -1 +13 -216 46.0% -0.06 8–9 (47%) 10–16 (38%) 96.3 -0.37 2012 1764 140.0 -3.89 +1.02 0.912 48.4% -75 +8 -38 46.2% -0.38 8–5 (62%) 10–5 (67%) 109.7 +0.35
26 2026 1764 141.8 +1.86 -0.36 1.030 50.2% +1 +52 -275 51.2% -0.01 12–7 (63%) 15–12 (56%) 107.5 +0.90 2013 1933 165.8 -1.81 +4.34 1.027 50.6% -168 +182 -226 58.3% +0.36 13–11 (54%) 13–9 (59%) 105.6 -0.89
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1824 155.2 -2.34 +1.83 0.959 49.1% -21 +165 -68 56.4% +0.07 14–5 (74%) 11–4 (73%) 107.7 +2.30
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1908 159.9 -1.81 +2.86 1.001 50.0% -62 +90 — 51.4% +0.05 12–5 (71%) 9–11 (45%) 106.5 +0.93
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1871 155.5 -1.25 +2.39 1.019 50.5% -16 +34 — 52.5% +0.19 10–9 (53%) 8–9 (47%) 97.1 +0.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1946 159.9 -1.21 +2.19 1.002 50.1% -11 -23 -165 56.7% +0.10 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) 109.2 -0.17
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1944 156.4 -0.63 +3.84 1.087 51.6% -12 +56 -127 60.8% +0.58 16–8 (67%) 7–8 (47%) 102.3 +2.85
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1908 157.6 -2.55 +2.86 0.977 49.6% -19 +81 -89 53.8% +0.05 9–5 (64%) 12–8 (60%) 104.4 +0.99
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1799 125.0 -2.89 -0.42 0.870 47.4% +50 +60 — 39.5% -0.53 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.0 +0.27
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1773 149.5 -1.39 +0.94 0.972 49.6% +28 +52 +62 52.7% -0.02 4–9 (31%) 13–7 (65%) 99.3 +1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1703 141.0 -3.90 +0.04 0.885 48.0% +22 +76 — 45.5% -0.40 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 102.8 +0.20
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1692 133.5 -4.24 +2.71 0.941 48.7% -31 +89 — 47.4% -0.49 2–6 (25%) 8–1 (89%) 101.7 -0.21
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1679 121.5 -3.83 -1.47 0.833 46.6% -78 +120 +144 44.9% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 +0.27
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1579 103.9 -1.49 -2.36 0.717 43.9% — +125 +163 21.1% -2.10 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.30
Career — 1886 144.3 +0.51 +0.24 1.013 50.1% -37 +56 -237 48.2% -0.04 40–43 (48%) 53–68 (44%) 99.9 +1.04 — 2033 153.0 -2.64 +1.84 0.954 49.2% -46 +84 -49 50.2% -0.15 151–117 (56%) 154–119 (56%) 109.2 +0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.