H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Roberto Bautista Agut H2H: 0-2
Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 2–0 lead over Tomas Martin Etcheverry in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2025 Vanda Pharmaceuticals Mallorca Championships third round 5-7 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2025* | Vanda Pharmaceuticals Mallorca Championships | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Roberto Bautista Agut | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2024* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | #30 | #25 | 1,660 | 1,887 | 104 | 115 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Roberto Bautista Agut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #79 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #59 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 |