H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Roberto Bautista Agut H2H: 0-2

Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 2–0 lead over Tomas Martin Etcheverry in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2025 Mallorca Championships first round 5-7 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Argentina Age 27 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Roberto Bautista Agut
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberto Bautista Agut #43 5-7 6-3 6-2 Tomas Martin Etcheverry #53 Match data Jun 25, 2025* R32 Mallorca Championships ATP 250 Grass
Roberto Bautista Agut #60 7-6(2) 6-4 Tomas Martin Etcheverry #35 Match data Oct 18, 2024* R16 Antwerp ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Martin Etcheverry #32 #25 1,660 1,885 110 121 47.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Roberto Bautista Agut #232 #9 3,215 2,104 415 296 58.4% 0 0 0 1 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Roberto Bautista Agut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2021 1–2 33.3% #130 1,506 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,552 0 0
22 2022 3–14 17.6% #79 1,519 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0
23 2023 29–27 51.8% #30 1,771 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2024 29–28 50.9% #39 1,784 0 0 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,658 0 0
25 2025 22–28 44.0% #59 1,750 0 0 2013 26–22 54.2% #58 1,801 0 0
26 2026 26–22 54.2% #32 1,764 0 1 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,029 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2016 49–23 68.1% #14 1,992 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 2,003 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,934 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,945 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,962 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,845 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,878 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,747 0 11
36 — — — — — — — 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,813 0 12
37 — — — — — — — 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12
38 — — — — — — — 2026 4–13 23.5% #232 1,631 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Roberto Bautista Agut
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2023 9 13 22 40.9% 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 10 14 24 41.7% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2025 12 12 24 50.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2026 8 9 17 47.1% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2014 25 15 40 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 1 8 87.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 25 17 42 59.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 37 16 53 69.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 30 13 43 69.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 19 11 30 63.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 25 13 38 65.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 7 2 9 77.8%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 19 13 32 59.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 10 12 22 45.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 12 13 25 48.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 4 10 14 28.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 41 54 95 43.2% 65 54 119 54.6% 4 13 17 23.5% — 255 181 436 58.5% 103 85 188 54.8% 57 30 87 65.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Tomas Martin Etcheverry's and 698/711 of Roberto Bautista Agut's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Roberto Bautista Agut
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2021 3/3 3.3 1.0 72.3% 66.9% 47.0% 45.3% 32.0% 61.8% 38.5% 2009 1/1 0.0 1.0 58.3% 65.3% 45.7% 44.4% 50.0% 57.1% 37.5%
22 2022 17/17 4.0 2.6 67.2% 63.0% 47.8% 48.2% 36.6% 58.3% 31.5% 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.5% 57.1% 55.6% 62.5% 0.0% 56.6% 34.7%
23 2023 56/56 6.2 1.7 64.3% 71.4% 53.4% 60.1% 39.0% 64.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 55/57 6.8 1.7 65.5% 72.7% 50.3% 60.6% 40.9% 64.8% 36.9% 2012 13/13 2.5 2.8 60.9% 65.2% 44.8% 55.4% 37.6% 57.1% 38.8%
25 2025 48/50 6.6 1.7 62.6% 71.7% 50.6% 59.9% 38.0% 63.8% 36.1% 2013 48/48 2.2 1.7 70.5% 65.0% 53.7% 58.9% 47.9% 61.7% 40.2%
26 2026 48/49 5.9 1.9 64.1% 72.7% 54.4% 49.2% 37.4% 66.0% 35.0% 2014 64/65 2.7 2.0 69.2% 70.0% 53.4% 63.0% 46.8% 64.8% 39.9%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 70/70 3.7 1.9 64.3% 72.5% 56.4% 65.4% 44.7% 66.7% 37.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 65/72 3.5 2.2 65.4% 69.7% 53.2% 58.5% 42.5% 64.1% 40.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 67/68 2.9 2.2 63.1% 71.4% 55.6% 57.2% 45.1% 65.5% 42.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 51/51 3.2 2.0 63.6% 71.6% 54.1% 64.0% 46.4% 65.4% 39.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 61/62 3.9 1.7 65.7% 73.0% 56.5% 61.9% 43.0% 67.4% 39.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 22/22 3.6 2.3 66.8% 67.1% 55.5% 59.9% 43.5% 63.2% 42.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 51/52 3.3 1.7 65.3% 70.8% 55.0% 58.0% 47.3% 65.1% 40.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 48/50 2.9 1.7 66.1% 71.2% 54.3% 60.5% 42.5% 65.4% 40.5%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/38 3.9 1.8 65.7% 70.2% 56.1% 48.4% 39.3% 65.2% 36.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 44/44 2.7 2.0 68.2% 68.5% 53.6% 61.0% 46.3% 63.7% 37.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 37/37 2.7 2.1 66.2% 67.9% 49.2% 54.3% 41.2% 61.7% 36.4%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 17/17 3.3 1.5 68.3% 63.4% 49.5% 55.5% 21.5% 59.1% 29.1%
Career — 227/232 6.2 1.8 64.5% 71.4% 51.8% 56.8% 38.7% 64.3% 36.1% — 698/711 3.2 2.0 66.0% 70.0% 54.2% 59.6% 43.8% 64.5% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Martin Etcheverry Roberto Bautista Agut
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1516 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2020 1482 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1520 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 1506 109.0 +1.47 -1.14 1.006 49.6% — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.39 2009 1552 103.5 +1.07 -0.83 0.875 47.6% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — 0.00
22 2022 1519 114.7 -3.40 -3.65 0.755 45.2% -2 +69 — 24.4% -1.67 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 99.2 +0.87 2010 1512 104.6 +2.71 -1.02 0.798 45.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — 0.00
23 2023 1772 148.1 +1.24 +1.26 1.068 51.0% -110 +51 -222 51.4% +0.20 11–11 (50%) 12–19 (39%) 101.2 -0.07 2011 1527 111.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 1784 150.6 +0.03 +1.39 1.049 50.9% -44 +89 -252 52.1% +0.21 7–12 (37%) 13–17 (43%) 96.1 +0.68 2012 1658 125.8 -3.50 +0.03 0.904 47.8% +40 — — 24.1% -1.07 1–1 0–2 — +0.77
25 2025 1751 140.7 +0.17 -0.20 0.999 49.9% -1 +13 -216 46.0% -0.06 8–9 (47%) 10–16 (38%) 96.3 -0.37 2013 1801 149.4 -1.14 +2.56 1.049 50.8% -5 -134 -122 55.2% +0.16 9–7 (56%) 16–4 (80%) 112.8 +0.31
26 2026 1764 141.8 +1.86 -0.36 1.030 50.2% +1 +52 -275 51.2% -0.01 12–7 (63%) 15–12 (56%) 107.5 +1.19 2014 2030 165.9 +1.17 +3.88 1.135 52.4% -48 -120 -136 63.1% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–7 (63%) 111.4 +0.17
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1997 164.8 +2.59 +2.45 1.136 52.3% +5 -85 -72 58.5% +0.74 8–11 (42%) 11–12 (48%) 95.5 -0.10
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1993 166.6 +0.70 +3.83 1.115 52.0% +18 -28 -84 60.2% +0.64 16–10 (62%) 18–13 (58%) 101.1 +1.33
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 2004 165.0 +2.13 +5.30 1.216 53.4% +17 -43 -69 64.5% +0.96 9–9 (50%) 18–15 (55%) 98.3 +1.62
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1934 153.9 +1.51 +3.16 1.139 52.4% +2 +33 +16 58.9% +0.65 13–4 (76%) 10–15 (40%) 100.4 +1.35
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1945 168.2 +2.85 +3.28 1.198 52.6% +17 -23 +127 62.6% +0.84 13–10 (57%) 8–14 (36%) 96.4 -1.44
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1963 158.1 +0.25 +4.32 1.148 52.4% +5 -47 — 61.8% +0.84 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 -0.99
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1845 157.0 +1.63 +3.89 1.161 52.3% +59 +10 +180 55.6% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 90.9 +0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1879 155.5 +1.66 +3.64 1.172 52.8% +3 -22 +178 60.7% +0.92 5–8 (38%) 10–11 (48%) 94.4 +1.54
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1747 145.2 +1.16 +0.69 1.049 50.3% +31 +36 +265 47.1% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 12–12 (50%) 98.4 +0.23
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1814 141.9 -0.50 +1.21 1.022 50.6% -33 -28 +201 51.8% +0.04 6–7 (46%) 11–5 (69%) 102.5 -0.45
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1771 133.9 -1.44 +0.34 0.951 49.2% -82 -25 +183 39.6% -0.44 7–4 (64%) 6–11 (35%) 97.4 -1.65
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1632 116.3 -4.25 -3.11 0.711 44.4% +43 +10 — 27.5% -1.57 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 -0.07
Career — 1886 144.3 +0.51 +0.24 1.013 50.1% -37 +56 -237 48.2% -0.04 40–43 (48%) 53–68 (44%) 99.9 +1.16 — 2104 160.3 +0.95 +2.89 1.104 51.7% +5 -39 +70 56.5% +0.48 125–104 (55%) 151–142 (52%) 99.9 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.