H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Roberto Carballes Baena H2H: 2-0
Tomas Martin Etcheverry holds a 2–0 lead over Roberto Carballes Baena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Martin Etcheverry leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Martin Etcheverry won the 2024 Buenos Aires third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2024* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 6-4 6-1 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2023* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | #30 | #25 | 1,660 | 1,887 | 104 | 115 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Roberto Carballes Baena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #79 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #59 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |