H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Robin Haase
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Robin Haase.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | #30 | #25 | 1,660 | 1,887 | 104 | 115 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Robin Haase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #79 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #59 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2026 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |