H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Thiago Seyboth Wild H2H: 2-0
Tomas Martin Etcheverry holds a 2–0 lead over Thiago Seyboth Wild in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Martin Etcheverry leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Martin Etcheverry won the 2024 Lyon fourth round 7-5 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 26
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2024* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 7-5 3-0 (ret.) | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Match data |
| May 11, 2024* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 6-3 7-5 | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | #30 | #25 | 1,660 | 1,887 | 104 | 115 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #284 | #58 | 855 | 1,775 | 38 | 50 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Thiago Seyboth Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #79 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2023 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #59 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |