H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Andreas Maurer H2H: 3-0
Tomas Smid holds a 3–0 lead over Andreas Maurer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1987 Barcelona second round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1987* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 7-6 6-3 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
| Jul 23, 1983* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1982* | Munich-2 Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-2 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Andreas Maurer | #1,008 | #24 | 12 | 1,821 | 114 | 138 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Andreas Maurer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #65 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #384 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |