H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Antonio Zugarelli H2H: 1-0
Tomas Smid holds a 1–0 lead over Antonio Zugarelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1978 Stockholm second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1978* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Smid | 6-3 6-1 | Antonio Zugarelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Antonio Zugarelli | #827 | #24 | 0 | 1,788 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Antonio Zugarelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #107 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #135 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #287 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |