H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 5-4

Tomas Smid holds a 5–4 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 4–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1986 Austrian Open Kitzbühel round of 16 7-5 6-3.

CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
HUN Age 72 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #39 7-5 6-3 Balazs Taroczy #197 Match data Aug 8, 1986* R16 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP 250 Clay
Balazs Taroczy #48 6-4 6-7 6-3 Tomas Smid #13 Match data Nov 9, 1984* R16 Wembley ATP 250 Carpet
Tomas Smid #21 6-4 6-4 Balazs Taroczy #32 Match data Jul 24, 1983* F Dutch Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #31 6-2 4-6 6-4 Balazs Taroczy #15 Match data May 14, 1982* R16 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Balazs Taroczy #17 7-6 7-5 7-6 Tomas Smid #26 Match data May 29, 1981* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Balazs Taroczy #19 3-6 6-4 6-3 Tomas Smid #28 Match data Oct 25, 1980* QF Vienna ATP 250 Hard
Balazs Taroczy #23 6-2 6-2 6-1 Tomas Smid #35 Match data Jul 29, 1979* F Dutch Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid 6-0 0-6 6-1 Balazs Taroczy Match data Mar 30, 1979* R16 Milan ATP 250 Carpet
Tomas Smid 7-6 7-5 Balazs Taroczy Match data Oct 13, 1978* SF Madrid ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Balazs Taroczy #732 #12 0 2,002 381 229 62.5% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Balazs Taroczy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1972 4–3 57.1% 1,564 0 0
19 1973 3–5 37.5% #193 1,554 0 0
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1974 21–12 63.6% #38 1,771 0 1
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1975 17–16 51.5% #69 1,822 0 1
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1976 37–20 64.9% #31 1,849 0 2
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1977 38–23 62.3% #31 1,852 0 2
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1978 44–18 71.0% #20 1,908 0 4
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 1979 41–22 65.1% #42 1,814 0 6
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 1980 46–16 74.2% #22 1,930 0 9
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 1981 45–17 72.6% #15 1,939 0 11
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 1982 43–24 64.2% #27 1,864 0 13
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 1983 13–14 48.1% #52 1,783 0 13
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 1984 18–20 47.4% #43 1,751 0 13
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 1985 9–17 34.6% #157 1,645 0 13
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 1986 2–2 50.0% #382 1,642 0 13
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Balazs Taroczy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
19 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 29 14 43 67.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1977 3 4 7 42.9% 29 16 45 64.4% 6 3 9 66.7%
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% 12 7 19 63.2% 1978 7 3 10 70.0% 33 10 43 76.7% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 32 13 45 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% 1980 5 2 7 71.4% 37 9 46 80.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 40 12 52 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1982 2 1 3 66.7% 31 15 46 67.4% 10 8 18 55.6%
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1983 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1984 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1986 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0%
Career 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% 38 35 73 52.1% 286 134 420 68.1% 14 13 27 51.9% 43 47 90 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Balazs Taroczy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1972 1565 121.5 +57 52.6% +0.16 0–1 +0.47
19 1973 1554 107.9 +43 -20 38.9% -0.61 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.06
20 1976 1542 125.7 -33 +68 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 94.4 +0.89 1974 1771 134.2 -88 +24 -193 59.8% +0.47 6–6 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 104.8 +2.47
21 1977 1639 136.8 -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) 92.3 +1.24 1975 1822 144.6 -131 +46 52.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 103.7 -2.56
22 1978 1799 150.6 -122 +63 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) 105.4 +0.34 1976 1849 144.3 -88 +40 59.9% +0.80 12–6 (67%) 5–7 (42%) 102.3 +1.42
23 1979 1871 159.1 -70 +110 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) 104.6 -1.69 1977 1853 149.0 -90 +29 60.8% +0.85 7–10 (41%) 5–5 (50%) 94.1 +1.51
24 1980 1923 155.5 +11 +3 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -2.22 1978 1908 153.4 -103 +93 65.6% +1.25 14–8 (64%) 6–9 (40%) 101.1 +1.19
25 1981 1854 157.2 +46 +62 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) 104.7 -1.40 1979 1814 149.3 -60 +157 -208 60.4% +0.93 12–7 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 98.7 +1.25
26 1982 1894 156.3 +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) 102.8 -0.62 1980 1931 156.3 -176 +80 -225 69.6% +1.32 9–6 (60%) 9–8 (53%) 99.7 -0.18
27 1983 1903 155.6 -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 94.2 -2.90 1981 1940 157.8 -191 +103 -216 67.1% +1.22 11–6 (65%) 12–9 (57%) 101.9 -0.14
28 1984 1841 154.8 +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) 97.7 -1.32 1982 1864 151.2 -49 +58 58.3% +0.42 19–8 (70%) 15–10 (60%) 105.6 -0.65
29 1985 1805 149.1 +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) 103.3 +1.83 1983 1784 148.0 +17 +44 46.9% +0.09 4–4 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 94.5 -1.31
30 1986 1724 130.9 +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) 93.3 +1.95 1984 1751 140.2 -22 +109 49.0% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 7–12 (37%) 99.3 -1.48
31 1987 1731 138.3 -67 +83 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) 100.8 -0.84 1985 1645 133.7 +37 +90 40.0% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 4–8 (33%) 94.8 -1.57
32 1988 1657 139.2 +9 +87 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) 100.6 -2.59 1986 1643 107.5 +109 40.0% -0.40 2–0 1–2 (33%) +0.18
33 1989 1537 102.8 +74 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.0 +0.70
Career 1994 155.1 -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 2002 154.5 -76 +76 -183 59.2% +0.68 108–73 (60%) 86–93 (48%) 99.3 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.