H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Bruce Manson H2H: 2-1
Tomas Smid holds a 2–1 lead over Bruce Manson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Bruce Manson won the 1983 US Open second round 6-3 3-6 7-5 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Bruce Manson | 6-3 3-6 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1981* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Smid | 7-6 3-6 7-6 | Bruce Manson | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1979* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-4 | Bruce Manson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Bruce Manson | #597 | #39 | 0 | 1,838 | 129 | 171 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Bruce Manson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #187 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #215 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #105 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #83 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #135 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |