H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 2-1
Tomas Smid holds a 2–1 lead over Buster C Mottram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1983 Bournemouth quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1983* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-3 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1979* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-1 6-0 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1976* | Aviles | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 7-5 6-1 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tomas Smid | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |