H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Carlos Kirmayr H2H: 2-0
Tomas Smid holds a 2–0 lead over Carlos Kirmayr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1982 Amsterdam Wct quarterfinal 6-4 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 75
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1982* | Amsterdam Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-7 6-4 | Carlos Kirmayr | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1982* | Zell Am See Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-3 1-6 6-0 | Carlos Kirmayr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Carlos Kirmayr | #621 | #36 | 0 | 1,892 | 135 | 157 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Carlos Kirmayr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #103 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #120 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #78 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #57 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #64 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #41 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #119 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |