H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Claudio Panatta H2H: 5-1

Tomas Smid holds a 5–1 lead over Claudio Panatta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 4–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1986 Italian Open round of 64 1-6 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Claudio Panatta
ITA Age 66 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #33 1-6 6-2 6-0 Claudio Panatta #203 Match data May 14, 1986* R64 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Tomas Smid #15 6-3 7-5 Claudio Panatta #129 Match data Mar 28, 1985* R32 Milan ATP 250 Carpet
Claudio Panatta #93 4-6 6-4 6-2 Tomas Smid #24 Match data Sep 22, 1983* R32 Geneva Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #21 6-1 3-6 6-3 1-6 6-1 Claudio Panatta Match data May 25, 1983* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tomas Smid #23 6-2 6-4 Claudio Panatta #70 Match data Sep 25, 1982* QF Geneva Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #26 6-4 6-2 Claudio Panatta #81 Match data Jul 16, 1982* R16 Zell Am See Wct ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Claudio Panatta #1,038 #46 18 1,749 100 135 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Claudio Panatta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1979 0–2 0.0% #546 1,468 0 0
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1981 7–6 53.8% — 1,551 0 0
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1982 29–26 52.7% #76 1,641 0 0
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1983 15–19 44.1% #68 1,702 0 0
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1984 10–19 34.5% #121 1,602 0 0
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 1985 15–15 50.0% #92 1,592 0 1
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 1986 7–16 30.4% #153 1,536 0 1
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 1987 8–16 33.3% #225 1,547 0 1
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 1988 8–7 53.3% #132 1,603 0 1
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 1989 1–9 10.0% #557 1,499 0 1
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Claudio Panatta
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 23 19 42 54.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 15 26 42.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 8 14 22 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1988 — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — —
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 13 22 35 37.1% 81 101 182 44.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Claudio Panatta
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1468 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.52
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1981 1551 125.8 — — — — — +39 — 51.7% -0.24 2–1 (67%) — — +0.79
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 1982 1642 129.4 — — — — -60 +1 — 52.2% +0.08 11–9 (55%) 9–9 (50%) — +4.25
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 1983 1702 137.7 — — — — -90 -30 — 43.5% -0.53 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.80
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 1984 1603 125.5 — — — — 0 +27 — 39.1% -0.97 2–8 (20%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.57
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 1985 1592 130.4 — — — — -30 +47 — 50.6% +0.22 5–7 (42%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.78
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 1986 1537 125.2 — — — — +16 +32 — 41.0% -0.51 2–8 (20%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.47
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 1987 1548 130.2 — — — — +16 +1 — 38.7% -0.65 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.32
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 1988 1603 125.1 — — — — — +11 — 57.9% +0.39 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) — +1.20
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 1989 1499 99.4 — — — — — +29 — 13.0% -2.35 1–0 0–1 — +0.28
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 1750 134.3 — — — — -31 +13 — 45.1% -0.35 35–50 (41%) 38–37 (51%) 98.2 +1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.