H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Colin Dibley H2H: 2-0
Tomas Smid holds a 2–0 lead over Colin Dibley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1980 Wembley fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1980* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 6-2 6-4 | Colin Dibley | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1976* | Aviles | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-1 6-2 | Colin Dibley | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Colin Dibley | #240 | #33 | 0 | 1,875 | 338 | 310 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Colin Dibley | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 41–21 | 66.1% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 52–30 | 63.4% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 35–31 | 53.0% | #39 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 35–36 | 49.3% | #87 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #94 | 1,606 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 39–39 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,655 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 52–33 | 61.2% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #116 | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #57 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,630 | 0 | 5 |