H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Dick Stockton H2H: 0-3
Dick Stockton holds a 3–0 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dick Stockton leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dick Stockton won the 1981 Philadelphia third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 1981* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Dick Stockton | 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1979* | Denver | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Dick Stockton | 7-6 7-6 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1978* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Dick Stockton | 6-1 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Dick Stockton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 |