H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Fritz Buehning H2H: 2-1

Tomas Smid holds a 2–1 lead over Fritz Buehning in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1983 Milan round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Fritz Buehning
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #22 6-2 6-4 Fritz Buehning #53 Match data Mar 24, 1983* R32 Milan ATP 250 Carpet
Fritz Buehning #37 7-5 7-5 Tomas Smid #22 Match data Mar 12, 1981* R32 Brussels ATP 250 Carpet
Tomas Smid #25 7-6 7-6 Fritz Buehning #41 Match data Feb 19, 1981* R32 La Quinta ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Fritz Buehning #807 #21 0 1,887 113 121 48.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Fritz Buehning
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1978 0–1 0.0% #555 1,494 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1979 12–12 50.0% #81 1,619 0 0
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1980 26–26 50.0% #68 1,833 0 1
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1981 24–20 54.5% #55 1,761 0 1
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1982 24–27 47.1% #64 1,664 0 1
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1983 22–21 51.2% #46 1,739 0 1
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1984 5–14 26.3% #148 1,616 0 1
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Fritz Buehning
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 10 18 44.4%
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 6 14 57.1%
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1982 7 11 18 38.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 9 9 18 50.0%
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1984 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 7 11 36.4%
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 45 48 93 48.4% 5 12 17 29.4% 22 18 40 55.0% 41 43 84 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Fritz Buehning
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1620 129.7 — — — — +39 -86 — 50.0% -0.13 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 +1.11
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 94.4 +0.89 1980 1833 148.2 — — — — -52 -312 -119 47.4% -0.20 11–7 (61%) 9–10 (47%) 108.0 -2.84
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) 92.3 +1.24 1981 1762 142.4 — — — — +48 -225 -57 55.0% +0.28 5–7 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 96.3 -1.54
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) 105.4 +0.34 1982 1665 136.6 — — — — +45 — -7 47.4% -0.43 12–10 (55%) 8–8 (50%) 99.9 -2.46
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) 104.6 -1.69 1983 1739 148.7 — — — — +66 — -61 48.5% -0.18 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 -4.00
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -2.22 1984 1617 127.5 — — — — +26 — — 31.1% -1.18 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 92.6 -0.70
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) 104.7 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) 102.8 -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 94.2 -2.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) 97.7 -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) 103.3 +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) 93.3 +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) 100.8 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) 100.6 -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.0 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 1888 146.5 — — — — +28 -227 -60 47.9% -0.24 41–38 (52%) 32–35 (48%) 100.4 -4.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.